I would like to know when "you are my ally" became "I won't question anything you do" under the Bush administration. In
this case, the government at the heart of the "war on terror," in Afghanistan, may not be that much better, in certain areas than the Taliban.
Afghanistan has sentenced to death one Sayed Parwez Kambakhsh, a journalism student at a university in northern Afghanistan. According to the story, Kambakhsh read an article on an Iranian website taking a differing stance from the wide view on a woman's role in Islamic society, and commented on it, apparently favorably.
By all accounts, you could practically hear the kangaroo inside the court recently as Kambakhsh went in for an appeals hearing. His judge, who had risen to the bench under the
Taliban, repeatedly interrupted Mr. Kambakhsh, acting more in the manner of a prosecutor than a judge, and displayed a definite antagonism towards his position. Kambakhsh's defenders had little time to prepare, and the judges throughout the series of trials have all clearly had the same antagonism towards his position.
Then, there's also this, from Registan.net:
Kambakhsh also stands accused of other crimes, such as asking too many questions in class, seeking attention and popularity, being impolite, and swapping dirty jokes over his cellphone.
This is bloody ridiculous. As the defendant's brother
put it: “Welcome to the Middle Ages.”
Many clerics have petitioned President Karzai to not not execute Kambakhsh. The issue has also apparently come up in talks between the U.S., the U.K. and Afghanistan.
Why does support for Afghanistan mean "execute all of the 'apostates' or 'heretics' that you like"? Replace them with "regime critics," and it starts seeming a little scary. It seems a bit obvious to me that the "new" Afghan government is just the Taliban in drag (that would be an interesting sight). As the Who put it, "Meet the new boss/Same as the old boss."
