I had a little run-in with a Paulian on The Caucus (NYTimes Politics blog), who claimed that "Dr." Paul's strategy is to target delegates. Oh really?
/*WARNING! Following content contains slight profanity! You've been warned!*/
He also claimed that Rep. Paul was winning in "states that don't get as much attention," or something like that. Oh really? Which states has he won...let me think...? Iowa? Nope. New Hampshire? Uh-uh. Michigan? Negative. South Carolina? No. The best he has done is 2nd place in Nevada. According to CNN, Rep. Paul has 6 delegates so far. NYT says that he has none. (Of course, we all know about how the NYTimes is so liberal. Courtesy of Rudy.)
This does not sound like the strategy of a healthy campaign to me. This sounds like a campaign that's saying, "We're screwed. We can't get out because our candidate has made such a commitment to this. Let's just whitewash the walls to cover up the fact that they're going to come down sooner or later."
The commenter is #4 in "Just When You Thought It Was Safe To Answer The Phone" on NYTimes.com, at this address if this link doesn't work: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/28/just-when-you-thought-it-was-safe-to-answer-the-phone/
No comments:
Post a Comment